Castell, Intermountain's value-based care company, uses Notable automation to review charts for care-gap closure opportunities. Notable reports average daily chart time falling from four hours to one hour and 1.68 minutes saved per chart.
Reported outcomes
Outcomes are reported exactly as stated by the source; we have not independently audited them.
How it works
- Automation pre-reviews charts and flags care gap closure opportunities.
- Staff review the flagged items.
Risks & compliance
- Automation writes into the EHR; errors propagate to registration and billing
- PHI handling (HIPAA)
- Vendor-published results; not independently audited
Healthcare cases cover operational and commercial workflows. Nothing here is medical advice or a claim about a device's or drug's efficacy.
Tools mentioned & how to build it
Disclosure: Some links may earn us a commission; it never affects grades. Tools are listed by fit to this case, never by payment.
Tools mentioned
- Notable (Notable)
AI agents for intake, scheduling, prior auth and care-gap outreach.
Build a version yourself
Sources
“How the value-based care health services company is using intelligent automation to review charts and identify opportunities for care gap closure.”Castell reduces average daily chart time from four hours to one hour
Grade rationale: Named organization with a quantified outcome from the vendor or the organization itself (self-reported). Automated check on Oct 17, 2026: 1/1 quotes and 2/2 outcome claims matched the source. Compiled by the Agent Casefile research desk (AI-assisted; see methodology). Spot an error? Request a correction.
