An independent publicationEvery case sourced, dated & graded A–DGet the weekly Casefile →
Grade BproductionSource date Oct 17, 2026· Last verified Oct 17, 2026

How is Philippine Airlines using a voice AI agent in its contact center?

Philippine Airlines · Transportation & Logistics

Header image: Travelers in a busy airport hall

Philippine Airlines deployed a Sierra voice agent in a contact center handling close to two million inbound calls a year. Sierra reports booking retrieval success lifted from 30% to 75% and mis-routed loyalty calls cut from 15.5% to 7.2% after post-launch tuning.

Reported outcomes

booking retrieval success
from 30% to 75%
Source [1] · self-reported
mis-routed loyalty calls
from 15.5% to 7.2%
Source [1] · self-reported
FAQ accuracy (pre-launch testing)
98%+ across more than 900 scenarios
Source [1] · self-reported

Outcomes are reported exactly as stated by the source; we have not independently audited them.

How it works

  1. Voice agent handles booking retrieval, FAQs, and loyalty transfers.
  2. Post-launch data analysis used to simplify verification and question flows.

Risks & compliance

  • Wrong or hallucinated answers to customers; needs guardrails and handoff
  • Vendor-published results; not independently audited
Build this yourself

Tools mentioned & how to build it

Disclosure: Some links may earn us a commission; it never affects grades. Tools are listed by fit to this case, never by payment.

Tools mentioned

  • Sierra (Sierra)
    Conversational AI agents for customer service, chat and voice.

Build a version yourself

  • n8n
    Open-source workflow automation with AI agent nodes; self-host or cloud.
  • HubSpot (Breeze agents)
    SMB-friendly CRM with Breeze AI agents for prospecting and support.
  • Retell AI
    Build and deploy phone agents for scheduling, intake and call routing.

All tools by category →

Sources

[1]Sierra· vendor customer story· Undated (accessed Oct 17, 2026)
“The agent delivered 98%+ accuracy across more than 900 FAQ test scenarios and a perfect pass rate on functional UAT.”
Philippine Airlines and Sierra

Grade rationale: Named organization with a quantified outcome from the vendor or the organization itself (self-reported). Automated check on Oct 17, 2026: 1/1 quotes and 3/3 outcome claims matched the source. Compiled by the Agent Casefile research desk (AI-assisted; see methodology). Spot an error? Request a correction.

Keep reading

Related cases